Practice fees

Fee Estimator Help

Build an architectural fee range and stage allocation from user-defined percentages, scope factors, services and reimbursables.

How to use the Fee Estimator

Prepare a current construction-value or time basis, scope, programme, procurement route, consultant responsibilities and known risk factors before building a fee range.

The workspace starts blank. Load example temporarily fills the controls with demonstration data; reload or use the tool’s New or reset action, where provided, before entering live information.

  • Choose Project / commission type, enter Construction value and your own low and high fee percentages, then cite the estimate or cost-plan reference.
  • Write the scope summary and enter explicit complexity, refurbishment, schedule and delivery or commercial risk adjustments.
  • Add fixed or additional services, subconsultants, reimbursables and any optional tax or addition as separate values.
  • Allocate the service-stage fee, state assumptions, exclusions and change triggers, then review the full Fee range rather than one preferred total.

Worked examples

These examples explain the set-up, expected output and review needed without changing the tool workspace.

Residential renovation scenario

Set-up
Use a current cost plan, enter a practice-defined fee range and record survey uncertainty, occupied-site working and programme risk separately.
Result
The output shows the adjusted range, stage allocation and other allowances with assumptions.
Review
Compare the implied staff time and deliverables with the actual resource plan before turning it into a proposal.

Base percentage comparison

Set-up
For a construction value of 750,000, compare a 7–9 percent base range before adding consultants, reimbursables or tax.
Result
The unadjusted base range is 52,500–67,500, making later risk and scope additions visible.
Review
Treat the percentages as your scenario inputs, not as market benchmarks supplied by the tool.

Suggested workflow

Place the tool in a controlled project or practice process rather than treating its output as an isolated verdict.

  • Define deliverables, responsibilities and programme, then choose a defensible internal pricing basis.
  • Model scope, risk and pass-through costs transparently and test the result against resource time.
  • Issue a proposal that states services, assumptions, exclusions, payment terms and change control.

Check before saving or issuing

  • Construction value and cost-plan reference are current and use the intended currency and tax basis.
  • Stage allocations total the fee basis and match the service actually offered.
  • Subconsultants, expenses, exclusions and change triggers are not hidden inside the percentage.

Common problems

  • Fee grows unexpectedly: inspect each percentage adjustment and confirm whether it compounds or adds under the displayed method.
  • Stage values do not support delivery: compare them with planned hours and seniority, not only the percentage split.
  • Client reads the range as a quote: label the exercise as internal until scope and commercial terms are agreed.

Output

A transparent stage service and fee work plan with assumptions and totals.

Professional boundary

This is not a market benchmark or fee proposal; validate scope, procurement, program, risk, taxes and contract terms for the commission.